CAVENDISH ALTHOUGH BRILLIANT IN PRINCIPLE IS FLAWED BY ITS USE OF FERROUS METALS OR OBJECTS COCONTAINING FERROUS METALS ??????
Please read the full article and research the information i am supplying and suggesting before dismissing what i am about to suggest.
Like many people especially scientists, i too have looked into the CAVENDISH EXPERIMENT and on face value yes all seems to point to a GRAVITATIONAL PULL, but i put it to you people reading this article, that this is not the case and in fact FERROUS METALS provide the effect we see during this experiment.
I know this coming from me is sounding NUTS to say the least, but please bear with me and all will come apparent.
I know you are all SCREAMING some used STAINLESS STEEL AND LEAD, and i agree they did, but what you may NOT KNOW is, NO METAL REGARDLESS OF ITS PURITY IS 100% NON FERROUS, it is simply impossible to be so.
I know this due to working in the metals/steel industry for some years.You get different grades of steel, take stainless steels for example, these can be checked out and so can their quality and likely amount of ferrous metals contained within their structure. Stainless steel has to have something called a TEST CERT, a certificate of purity if you like as well as endurance/destruction and pressure testing.
Stainless steel is thought to be > as suggested STAINLESS and NON FERROUS ?. well it isn’t.
HERE ARE SOME OF THE GRADES LISTED BELOW
304/316>> BEING THE PUREST USED FOR SURGERY EQUIPMENT
301/302/304 DUPLEX/ SUPER DUPLEX
as well as many others as you will see in the provided link.
Please investigate my claims here, do NOT take what i say for granted as they do WITH SCIENCE .So even with the HIGHEST QUALITY stainless steel it contains traces of FERROUS METALS these are very small but they still are moulded into the structure of the steel.
The same goes for ALL METALS regardless of the APPARENT none MAGNETIC FIELD, they all still have one , even GOLD isn’t 100% pure.
Now some will be saying BUT HE USED ROCKS/BRICKS??, again they contain FERROUS METALS, please do your research on this folks.To be honest it would be EXTREMELY HARD to find anything on the planet that does not have traces of FERROUS METALS within it, FOOD/CLOTHING/ANIMALS/SOIL/PEOPLE AND EVEN THE AIR WE BREATH have tiny traces of ferrous metals.
IT IS IMPERATIVE you do research to either confirm or deny my claims.
So hopefully you have done your investigations and come to the conclusion i am making sense in the claims made regarding the FERROUS metals, So we must bear this in mind as i put the following to you.
As with many of the CAVENDISH experiments, either METAL of some kind is used or BRICKS/ROCKS, so bearing in mind FERROUS METALS have a natural attraction, i put it to you that MAGNETISM is what we are witnessing and not as claimed GRAVITY?.
If it was gravity as claimed, surely the rotating objects would pull to the GREATER MASS ?? this in many cases being> the floor ?, but no, they pull to the METALS/ROCKS/BRICKS, now i agree this is an attraction, but it is not GRAVITY, it is simply the metal fibres within causing the attraction.
ANYTHING that has been machined such as METALS/BRICKS have gone through a process of heat and electricity, this builds up TINY magnetic forces, and these are minute, thus explaining the great amount of time needed for this experiment to work.
Let’s put the FERROUS metals within the objects used into perspective, imagine trying to pull a car with a handful of hair ?, it would be a very slow process, but providing the force is distributed correctly and applied equally as a magnetic force does,the car would slowly but surely move in the encourage intended direction.
Well the same principle applies during this test, TINY fragments of FERROUS metals are reacting and creating a very tiny attraction, not enough to appear even noticeable to us , but enough to ensure a magnetic pull and slowly but surely, the items in the experiment are attracted as they have NO RESISTANCE, for example, dragged across a floor or table.
Obviously the higher the mass of electrically charge ferrous metals, the greater the force should be.
I hope i have thrown a spanner into the SCIENTIFIC WORLD and made you question the very principles you have relied upon for decades.As this is the KEY to understanding and moving forward, simply denying suggestions and sticking to THEORIES because > that’s how it is, will NEVER explain the truth, it will only HAMPER your investigations and experiments.
PLEASE GIVE ME FEEDBACK
If you like please pass this around.
and as usual THANK YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO READ